This guy makes me wanna bang my head against a brick wall.

January 11, 2009 at 10:23 pm (Uncategorized)

<object width=”425″ height=”344″><param name=”movie” value=”http://www.youtube.com/v/fSrZVF3FEUQ&hl=en&fs=1″></param><param name=”allowFullScreen” value=”true”></param><param name=”allowscriptaccess” value=”always”></param><embed src=”http://www.youtube.com/v/fSrZVF3FEUQ&hl=en&fs=1” type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” allowscriptaccess=”always” allowfullscreen=”true” width=”425″ height=”344″></embed></object>

 

Peter Rollins, always the voice of sanity when I get too depressed by fundamentalist God-spam (and the object of my current intellectual/theological-crush), sums it up pretty well:

“…while I may have a little bit of the hippy in me (a type of person Driscoll seems to hate with a wild passion) I am not, contrary to the spirit of the video, too afraid to say what I think when the need arises… especially when it is against a misogynistic diatribe that may be taken seriously by some.”

Advertisements

Permalink Leave a Comment

Quick hit: patriarchy-to-English translation

January 11, 2009 at 8:30 pm (Uncategorized)

Via Urban Abess:

Patriarchy: ‘you’re too emotional’
Translation: ‘this issue only hurts women, so why get upset?’

Permalink Leave a Comment

Oh Catholicism.

January 11, 2009 at 5:16 pm (Feminism, LGBT, Religion)

 Queen Emily at Questioning Transphobia has an awesome theological critique of the Pope’s address against “gender theories”. I added the following comment:

To add another theological critique of the Pope’s words, look at the story of Philip and the Ethiopian eunuch (read: transgendered) in Acts 8: 26-39. In Deuteronomy 23 it clearly states that eunuchs cannot enter the “assembly of the Lord”. But post-Jesus (who came pretty much to do away with religion and dogma and open up God’s love to everyone ever), the evangelist Philip is like “F*** Deuteronomy” and baptizes him anyway. Yey Philip!

I see conservative Christians who have a problem with gender theories etc as just as silly as those who deny evolution because they take Genesis as a literal scientific narrative. *Science* will tell you gender isn’t binary. *Science* will tell you some people have a divergence between their body’s sex and their brain’s gender. *Science* will tell you ‘men’ and ‘women’ do not fit into tiny little boxes with fixed characteristics. *Science* will tell you intersex people exist. It’s not some figment of their imagination caused by their rebellion against God. Like, hello.

Oh, and by that token, *science* will tell you that sex is not inherently for procreation *cough*clitoris*cough*…

 I am a recovering Catholic myself, having been almost put off the idea of God by the Catholic Church – I’ve never gained anything from going to Church, it’s rarely challenged me or helped me grow as a Christian. Having at this point experienced Churches where you’re encouraged to think and grow and transform, I can safely say that the Catholic Church has missed the point. It’s entirely souless. In the Christian tradition, sin is not defined predominantly as rule-breaking, but as anything that blocks or leads people away from God. Which is exactly what dogmatic traditions do. Would it not be fair then to say that the Catholic Church borders on sinful?

 Or maybe I’ve just been reading too much Peter Rollins lately…

Permalink Leave a Comment